

#ULTIMA 4 QUEST OF THE AVATAR PC PC#
Whereas on the PC Ultima 5 shared the same general engine as Ultima 4, on the NES the game uses a Ultima 6 engine and the result isn't pretty. Ultima 5 on the NES is rare, and also more than a bit bad. Are they better than the computer versions? No. Ultima 4 in particular is streamlined in a good way. They're a bit simplified, but they definitely manage to bring a worthwhile Ultima experience. The NES Ultima 3 and 4 games are very good. the Ultima 3, 4 and 5 games are basically using the Dragon Warrior engine" I'm not sure what you mean by "I noticed that on the PC. but totally forgot that I had these! Pools of Radiance must suck on the NES. How weird is it that they basically ported these PC games? Kind of cool. and I also noticed I had AD&D Hillsfar, Heros of the Lance, and Pools of Radiance, Bards Tale, and. Total random side note, but I was looking at my NES games (I only have a few), because I wanted to verify that in fact the three Ultima games I had were 3, 4, and 5. is the plot the same for Ultima 4 on the PC and the NES version, and is the NES version basically better? the Ultima 3, 4 and 5 games are basically using the Dragon Warrior engine from what I can tell (is that true?). So I kind of want to go back and play those if possible since I hear that U4 has an awesome plot line.īut here's my question, I really hate the UI for the Ultima 1-5 games however, I noticed that on the PC. The first Ultima I personally started with, was Ultima 6 (and of course, Underworld 1 and 2, U7, U7 p2, and U8). It seemed way too out of date, and I just couldn't get into it. joke), the truth is, I've never really spent more than say.
